Kaplan's Quarterly
Volume 1, Edition 1 Spring 2015
Preamble
Among The Contributors
Voices in Time
![]() |
| A Destitute Mother Dorothea Lange 1936 |
"We think sometimes that poverty is only being hungry, naked and homeless. The poverty of being unwanted, unloved and uncared for is the greatest poverty. We must start in our own homes to remedy this kind of poverty."
- Mother Theresa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
· The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Dorothea Lange on May 22, 1964. The interview took place in New York City, and was conducted by Richard K. Doud for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution.
·
Dorothea Lange (1895-1965) was a photographer in
California, and worked on FSA photograph project during the Depression.
RICHARD K.DOUD: This is part of your growth. Well, how was it,
if you were working with the problem of say, the lower one-third, how then did
it happen that you became aware of what these people in Washington were trying
to do along these lines?
DOROTHEA LANGE: I assure you that I don't say that this is the
way it was. This is the way it seemed to me it was. And of course there were
many things that were going on that I, in California, was not aware of. But I
had made some photographs of the state as people, in an area of San Francisco, which
revealed how deep the depression was. It was at that time beginning to cut very
deep. This is a long process. It doesn't happen overnight. Life, for people,
begins to crumble on the edges; they don't realize it. But this particular
section was not far from the place where my studio was and I observed some
things that were happening. My powers of observation are fairly good, and I
have used them; I like to use them. Sometimes I'm aware of what's going on
behind me, you know. My angle of vision was almost 360º. That's training. But I
have done some photographs of this. One of them is my most famed photograph. I
made that on the first day I ever went out in an area where people said,
"Oh, don't go there." It was the first day that I ever made a
photograph on the street. I made the old man with the tin cup first, but that
was life.
RICHARD K. DOUD: These migratory projects you were doing and perhaps
other people were doing, have always impressed me perhaps more than some of the
other areas that were covered. I seem to feel more of an empathy, perhaps, with
the people photographed. I can see how close perhaps I came to being one of
these people, and I can understand my strong attachment or attraction to these
pictures. I'm not sure I can quite understand how someone who was born and
raised in a city could do as sensitive and powerful a job of photographing
these people as you did. I'm very sensitive to what you did, but I can't
understand how you could have been as sensitive to the situation as you
obviously were.
DOROTHEA LANGE: Well now the problems are enormous. There is no
place for people to go to live on the land any more, and they're living. That's
a wild statement, isn't it? And yet, it begins to look as though it's true in
our country. We have, in my lifetime, changed from rural to urban. In my
lifetime, that little space, this tremendous thing has happened. These people
on that rainy afternoon in April were the symbol; they were the symbol of his
tremendous upheaval like an earthquake. Now of course, the job is just to
photograph rural life. Those photographs don't exist. That what I want to set
up if I can.
RICHARD K. DOUD: It's part of the picture. An important part of
the picture.
RICHARD K. DOUD: Was this the "Golden Age" of
photography - the 1930's?
DOROTHEA LANGE: No, no. It wasn't the "Golden Age" but
something was done about it. The record was made. We're not doing that now.
Young photographers are jumping onto civil rights and it's a bandwagon, like
jumping onto the bandwagon. And poverty. That is the big thing everybody's
photographing now, it's almost a new style because the President's program to
abolish poverty. All the young photographers are coming to me- "how do you
photograph poverty now?" You know it's pathetic.
RICHARD K. DOUD: Well, why don't these pictures they're taking
now, why don't these pictures that certainly should mean more to me than
pictures of something that is long since gone, why aren't these pictures
reaching me the way your pictures did? Is it because I feel there's a
deliberate attempt to exploit the thing, or is it bad management, poor captions
perhaps or is it- what is it? I see the pictures that people are taking of the
distressed areas through the Appalachians, and I'm a little disgusted I think.
I'm not touched with the poor that are shown, or I'm not moved by the conditions
in which thy live. The pictures are more disgusting than they are, well,
appealing to my sense of charity or something. Why aren't they successful?
Maybe they are to other people; maybe I'm directly comparing them to something
else.
DOROTHEA LANGE: I feel the same way. There's no bridge. I feel
it many times. I suppose I would answer you, but it would be such a long
answer, and such a difficult one. I'd like to postpone that answer. If I come
to it so I can clearly state it to you, I'll write it to you sometime.
RICHARD K. DOUD: Well I'd like to know, because-
DOROTHEA LANGE: If I can do it. I have the answer in me, I have
it in me. But if I try to do it now, it'll come up in so many words that I'd
want to take back. You see I'll be feeling it out, and I have to some time on
that.
RICHARD K. DOUD: I will write you and remind you that I have
this problem that you're going to answer for me.
DOROTHEA LANGE: I have it too, and that is the importance of
recognizing that we have that problem, that we share it with millions of
others. It takes a lot to get full attention to a picture these days, because
we are bombarded by pictures every waking hour, in on form or another, and
transitory images seen, unconsciously, in passing, from the corner of our eyes,
flashing at us, and this business where we look at bad images- impure. I don't
know why the eye doesn't get calloused as your knees get calloused or your
fingers get calloused, the eye can't get…
RICHARD K. DOUD: I hope were not losing any of our sensitivity.
DOROTHEA LANGE: I think we are. I think we are. We are misusing
the language of picture, and I tell you, it's an exploited medium. It is not a
developing medium; it's being destroyed. That's what I meant.
RICHARD K. DOUD: Well I think it's the responsibility of people
like yourself to do something about it.
DOROTHEA LANGE: Well I'd like to. I'd be willing, if I had the
ability and the strength to do it. I'm going to try.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mechanizing man's work had changed but not lightened his toil. But it has not been noticed that
mechanizing the home has laid another load on the laborer's back: it has made simple poverty impossible. No household today can remain without the conveniences, beginning with the telephone and other utilities (as they are called), and going on to the car, radio, and television. Needed for holding one's job or socially imposed by the neighbors and one's children, they are part of an oppressive "standard of living." For some families this means moonlighting or perpetual debt; for others, who refuse the struggle, it is abject poverty instead of the tolerable life that an earlier age might have afforded" (Barzun 603-604).
-From Dawn To Decadence
![]() |
| The Wanton Dying in Poverty James Northcote 1796 |
PROVERBS, CHAP. XXXI. v. 20.
She stretches out her hand to the poor; yea, she reacheth forth her
hands to the needy.’
PROVERBS, CHAP. V. v. 11, 12, 13.
And
thou mourn at the laſt, when thy flesh and thy body are conſumed.
And say, how have I hated instruction, and my heart despised reproof!
And
have not obeyed the voice of my teachers, nor inclined mine ear to them that
instructed me.
THE scenes, which we have
hitherto contemplated, have progressively led us to one of the most affecting
nature, in which we at length behold the unhappy victim of vice and delusion
arrived at a catastrophe as miserable as the tenor of her life has been
erroneous: such indeed as is the natural effect of the conduct we have before
witnessed, and such as on a moment's recollection we shall perceive to be more
immediately the consequence of the unhappy state of riot and debauchery in which we last left her.
The splendor of vanity,
the intemperance of laughter, the feverish triumph of presumption and heedless
arrogance, are ceased. While the wanton flew headlong and irrevocably through
the paths which pleasure has strewed with blossoms torn rudely from the stalk,
she was not aware that poverty and disease lurked on her way; they have
assailed her, they have seized her, they have laden her with anguish, which she
was equally unprepared and unable to support, and the sufferings of a
distempered frame are at last about to be closed in death.
The preſent scene
exhibits the poor friendless prostitute in the agonies of expiring life, destitute
of every means of relief, and wanting all those consolations and supports,
which in this awful period attend the virtuous. An outcast from society, which
she has dishonoured; banished from that humanity and benevolence, whose protection
she has forfeited; to whom in this hour of extreme necessity does she consign
herself, to watch the painful moments of her dissolution? The minister of this
charge, ‘fit watch in such a night,’ is before us. A wretch, in whom, hardened
by being a continual witness of such scenes of misery, every vestige of feeling
appears to be finally extinguished. Callous to the anguish she was hired to
relieve, instead of attending to the pitiable object of her care, assiduously
inquiring her wants, or administering comfort to her laſt moments, her only solicitude
appears to have been habitually directed to herself. Her body sweltering and
bloated with gluttony, the dram and cordial "standing rubrick" on her
cheek, this miſcreant, wholly inebriated, snores over the exhauſted flaggon,
while the lamentable victim of more fatal imprudence, dropping the phial of
unavailing medicine, expires unnoticed at her feet. — Such is inevitably the
miserable exit of those, whom a disgraceful and an illspent life leaves disregarded
and forlorn in death.
In a gloomy chamber,
near whose door a rope, suspended from the roof, reminds us of ſome former
sufferer, who has sought relief in suicide, we behold our unfortunate heroine,
lying on a ruined floor, with no other bed than a little straw, while the
fragments of a wretched meal and the tattered remnants of her former gaiety, a
faded feather, hat, and cloak, are strewed on the ground around her, and at her
ſide a poor little innocent, ignorant of its pitiable situation, embraces with
filial tenderness his cold and lifeless mother, on whose ear the last sounds
that vibrated, were the cries of this her now destitute and helpless orphan.
From objects, the one so
affecting, the other so disgusting, we should shrink at once with terror, if our
attention were not more pleasingly drawn to the engaging and now doubly-interesting
appearance of the former amiable friend and companion, who, though too late to
afford the relief that would have gratified her tender heart, has ſought out
the gloomy retreat of poverty and shame; and, overcome with grief at the ſight
which preſents itself to her, wipes from her eyes the tears that fall for the sufferings
of a fellow-creature; ‘"Tears, from sweet Virtue's source, benevolent to
all."’
Prepared to offer every
means of assistance, she has filled her frugal purse with the savings of her
own industry, and the larger bounty which her entreaties, ever the ready
advocates of distress, have obtained from the worthy and benevolent housekeeper.
In the hurry of taking her purse from her pocket, she has dropped her housewife; which being observed by
the little messenger of gluttony, just returning to the old nurſe with a fresh
supply of her favourite cordial, accustomed to watch the opportunities of
knavery, he is artfully employed in drawing it, by means of a crooked stick,
towards the door, behind which he hides himself during the commission of the
theft. A melancholy presage of that ruinous course of life, which must bring
him to the most fatal and disgraceful end.—The principal intention of the scene,
exhibited to us in this picture, may be more forcibly impressed by the
following lines:
How could I once look up or heave the head,
Who, like a foolish pilot, have shipwreck'd
My vessel, trusted to me from above!
— Thou bear'ſt
Enough, and more, the burthen of that fault;
Bitterly hast thou paid and still art paying
That rigid score.
Diligence and Dissipation: or the progress of a modest girl and a wanton
- James Northcote
1796
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
| Poor People's March on Washington -Gary May 1968 |
“It
is time to mark clearly the aim of the Revolution and the end toward which we
wish to move; it is time to take stock of ourselves, of the obstacles which we
still face, and of the means which we ought to adopt to attain our objectives.
What is the goal for which we strive? We
wish in a word to fulfill the requirements of nature, to accomplish the destiny
of mankind, to make good the promises of philosophy. The glory of all free
peoples that have existed, become the model of all nations.... That is our ambition;
that is our aim. The splendor of the goal of the French Revolution is
simultaneously the source of our strength and of our weakness. It rallies
against us all vicious men, all those who in their hearts seek to despoil the
people.
Virtue without which terror is murderous,
terror without which virtue is powerless. Terror
is nothing else than swift, severe, indomitable justice; it flows, then, from virtue" (Robespierre).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The hour-long glimpse I had of the rubble-hill and the destitute people stooping and wandering upon it haunts me more and more. As I think upon its sickening implications . . . my mind swings back to Michelle, who was a likeable enough person. You should never complain life is unfair to you, [she said,] and she never did. If she lacked compassion, well, just what was she supposed to do for those people? For that matter, what had I done? I threw a little money and some attention at a random few, then departed the premises."
|
-William T. Vollmann
Sold off Siblings
-Bettmann Corbis
1948
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Poverty is deeply "Happiness lies not inentwined with a more mere possession ofpoetic inquiry into money; it lies in thehappiness. On the table joy of achievement,is not just poverty, but in the thrill ofquestions of community, creative effort."fate and perspective." -Franklin D. Roosevelt,-Publishers Weekly First Inaugural Address(March 4, 1933)"It has been said that the great question is now at issue, whether man shall henceforth start forwards with accelerated velocity towards illimitable, and hitherto un-conceived improvement; or to be condemned to a perpetual oscillation between happiness and misery, and after every effort rain still at an immeasurable distance from the wished-for goal."An Essay on the Principal of Population-Thomas Robert Malthus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Day Book
Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers
1914
The Day Book
Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers
1914
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Overcoming poverty is not a task of charity, it is an act of justice. Like Slavery and Apartheid, poverty is not natural. It is man-made and it can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings. Sometimes it falls on a generation to be great. YOU can be that great generation. Let your greatness blossom."-Nelson Mandela
Unemployed - Ben Yu 1941
People of color have higher poverty rates than Whites; women have higher poverty rates than men; and children have higher poverty rates than adults. The elderly are one “success story” of poverty. Largely due to increased spending on Social Security and Supplemental Security Income, the poverty rate of the elderly dropped by about 25 percentage points from about 35 percent in 1960 to 10 percent in 2000.People of color have not experienced dramatic declines in economic hardship. In 2002, about 24% of African Americans lived in poverty, as did about 22% of Latinos, 10% of Whites, and 10% of Asian Americans. While the poverty rates of Black and Latinos were comparatively low in 2002, these groups were still over twice as likely as Whites to live in poverty. Blacks and Latinos had poverty rates almost three times those of Whites in 1992 and 1993. Several factors exacerbate economic hardship among people of color: racial segregation in housing, which is often associated with lower quality education; low human capital and structural shifts in the economy away from manufacturing jobs. Likewise, employment discrimination continues, evidenced by research on employers’ stereotypes about unequal treatment of workers of color and by research on minorities’ reports of unequal treatment. These factors increase unemployment rates and poverty; even during the economic boom of the late 1990s, workers of color had unemployment rates twice those of Whites.A good deal of research explores the “feminization of poverty,” or the trend by which women represent an increasing proportion of the poor. While in recent decades, non-elderly women’s representation among the poor has not increased faster than that of men’s, women have always had higher poverty rates than men. In 2002, women’s poverty rates were almost 3 percentage points higher than those of men – 12.5 percent compared to 9.9 percent. Persistent inequalities in labor markets such as sex gaps in pay, promotion, and authority, the sex segregation of jobs, and discrimination against women all contribute to the sex gap in poverty. While human capital differences explain some portion of labor market inequalities, gender gaps in education and experience have narrowed substantially over the past decades. This suggests that factors other than human capital contribute to gender inequality in employment. Some note that women’s greater likelihood of poverty lies in their parenthood as well as gender status; indeed, mothers’ earnings are consistently lower than those of female non-mothers, and mother have higher poverty rates than female non-mothers. Not only do mothers need more money to provide for their children, most also take time out of the labor force to care for them, thus decreasing their earnings. Female-headed households are particularly susceptible to poverty, given the gender inequalities in labor markets mentioned above, combined with the economic (and many non-pecuniary) challenges in raising children on one’s own. In 2002, 35 percent of female-headed households with children under 18 lived in poverty.A multiracial feminist perspective emphasizes the ways in which multiple social locations interact to affect women of color. Women of color have higher poverty rates than men of color and White women; for example, in 2002, 24 percent of Black women lived in poverty compared to 20 percent of Black men and 11 percent of White women. Households headed by women of color have astronomical poverty rates – 42 percent in 2002. These high poverty rates reflect marked economic disadvantage due to race/ethnicity, gender, and single parenthood.The Poverty Line Forty Years Later: Alternative Poverty Measures and Women's Lives- Karen Christopher---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Jacob Riis
"Necessité fait gens méprendre
Et fait jaillir le loup du bois.”
-François Villon
"Necessity makes people misunderstand
And brings out the wolf of the wood. "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
| Musée Carnavelet Paris, 1790 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
| The Barnyard - Jean-Baptiste Du Tertre 1667 |
"When nothing seems to help, I go look at a stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it."
-Jacob Riis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------![]() |
| Old Man -Liraco
I saw an aged Beggar in my walk;
And he was seated, by the highway side,
On a low structure of rude masonry
Built at the foot of a huge hill, that they
Who lead their horses down the steep rough road
May thence remount at ease. The aged Man
Had placed his staff across the broad smooth stone
That overlays the pile; and, from a bag
All white with flour, the dole of village dames,
He drew his scraps and fragments, one by one;
And scanned them with a fixed and serious look
Of idle computation. In the sun,
Upon the second step of that small pile,
Surrounded by those wild unpeopled hills,
He sat, and ate his food in solitude:
And ever, scattered from his palsied hand,
That, still attempting to prevent the waste,
Was baffled still, the crumbs in little showers
Fell on the ground; and the small mountain birds,
Not venturing yet to peck their destined meal,
Approached within the length of half his staff.
Him from my childhood have I known; and then
He was so old, he seems not older now;
He travels on, a solitary Man,
So helpless in appearance, that for him
The sauntering Horseman throws not with a slack
And careless hand his alms upon the ground,
But stops,--that he may safely lodge the coin
Within the old Man's hat; nor quits him so,
But still, when he has given his horse the rein,
Watches the aged Beggar with a look
Sidelong, and half-reverted. She who tends
The toll-gate, when in summer at her door
She turns her wheel, if on the road she sees
The aged beggar coming, quits her work,
And lifts the latch for him that he may pass.
The post-boy, when his rattling wheels o'ertake
The aged Beggar in the woody lane,
Shouts to him from behind; and if, thus warned,
The old man does not change his course, the boy
Turns with less noisy wheels to the roadside,
And passes gently by, without a curse
Upon his lips, or anger at his heart.
He travels on, a solitary Man;
His age has no companion. On the ground
His eyes are turned, and, as he moves along
'They' move along the ground; and, evermore,
Instead of common and habitual sight
Of fields with rural works, of hill and dale,
And the blue sky, one little span of earth
Is all his prospect. Thus, from day to day,
Bow-bent, his eyes for ever on the ground,
He plies his weary journey; seeing still,
And seldom knowing that he sees, some straw,
Some scattered leaf, or marks which, in one track,
The nails of cart or chariot-wheel have left
Impressed on the white road,--in the same line,
At distance still the same. Poor Traveller!
His staff trails with him; scarcely do his feet
Disturb the summer dust; he is so still
In look and motion, that the cottage curs,
Ere he has passed the door, will turn away,
Weary of barking at him. Boys and girls,
The vacant and the busy, maids and youths,
And urchins newly breeched--all pass him by:
Him even the slow-paced waggon leaves behind.
But deem not this Man useless.--Statesmen! ye
Who are so restless in your wisdom, ye
Who have a broom still ready in your hands
To rid the world of nuisances; ye proud,
Heart-swoln, while in your pride ye contemplate
Your talents, power, or wisdom, deem him not
A burthen of the earth! 'Tis Nature's law
That none, the meanest of created things,
Or forms created the most vile and brute,
The dullest or most noxious, should exist
Divorced from good--a spirit and pulse of good,
A life and soul, to every mode of being
Inseparably linked. Then be assured
That least of all can aught--that ever owned
The heaven-regarding eye and front sublime
Which man is born to--sink, howe'er depressed,
So low as to be scorned without a sin;
Without offence to God cast out of view;
Like the dry remnant of a garden-flower
Whose seeds are shed, or as an implement
Worn out and worthless. While from door to door,
This old Man creeps, the villagers in him
Behold a record which together binds
Past deeds and offices of charity,
Else unremembered, and so keeps alive
The kindly mood in hearts which lapse of years,
And that half-wisdom half-experience gives,
Make slow to feel, and by sure steps resign
To selfishness and cold oblivious cares.
Among the farms and solitary huts,
Hamlets and thinly-scattered villages,
Where'er the aged Beggar takes his rounds,
The mild necessity of use compels
To acts of love; and habit does the work
Of reason; yet prepares that after-joy
Which reason cherishes. And thus the soul,
By that sweet taste of pleasure unpursued,
Doth find herself insensibly disposed
To virtue and true goodness.
Some there are,
By their good works exalted, lofty minds
And meditative, authors of delight
And happiness, which to the end of time
Will live, and spread, and kindle: even such minds
In childhood, from this solitary Being,
Or from like wanderer, haply have received
(A thing more precious far than all that books
Or the solicitudes of love can do!)
That first mild touch of sympathy and thought,
In which they found their kindred with a world
Where want and sorrow were. The easy man
Who sits at his own door,--and, like the pear
That overhangs his head from the green wall,
Feeds in the sunshine; the robust and young,
The prosperous and unthinking, they who live
Sheltered, and flourish in a little grove
Of their own kindred;--all behold in him
A silent monitor, which on their minds
Must needs impress a transitory thought
Of self-congratulation, to the heart
Of each recalling his peculiar boons,
His charters and exemptions; and, perchance,
Though he to no one give the fortitude
And circumspection needful to preserve
His present blessings, and to husband up
The respite of the season, he, at least,
And 'tis no vulgar service, makes them felt.
Yet further.----Many, I believe, there are
Who live a life of virtuous decency,
Men who can hear the Decalogue and feel
No self-reproach; who of the moral law
Established in the land where they abide
Are strict observers; and not negligent
In acts of love to those with whom they dwell,
Their kindred, and the children of their blood.
Praise be to such, and to their slumbers peace!
--But of the poor man ask, the abject poor;
Go, and demand of him, if there be here
In this cold abstinence from evil deeds,
And these inevitable charities,
Wherewith to satisfy the human soul?
No--man is dear to man; the poorest poor
Long for some moments in a weary life
When they can know and feel that they have been,
Themselves, the fathers and the dealers-out
Of some small blessings; have been kind to such
As needed kindness, for this single cause,
That we have all of us one human heart.
--Such pleasure is to one kind Being known,
My neighbour, when with punctual care, each week
Duly as Friday comes, though pressed herself
By her own wants, she from her store of meal
Takes one unsparing handful for the scrip
Of this old Mendicant, and, from her door
Returning with exhilarated heart,
Sits by her fire, and builds her hope in heaven.
Then let him pass, a blessing on his head!
And while in that vast solitude to which
The tide of things has borne him, he appears
To breathe and live but for himself alone,
Unblamed, uninjured, let him bear about
The good which the benignant law of Heaven
Has hung around him: and, while life is his,
Still let him prompt the unlettered villagers
To tender offices and pensive thoughts.
--Then let him pass, a blessing on his head!
And, long as he can wander, let him breathe
The freshness of the valleys; let his blood
Struggle with frosty air and winter snows;
And let the chartered wind that sweeps the heath
Beat his grey locks against his withered face.
Reverence the hope whose vital anxiousness
Gives the last human interest to his heart.
May never HOUSE, misnamed of INDUSTRY,
Make him a captive!--for that pent-up din,
Those life-consuming sounds that clog the air,
Be his the natural silence of old age!
Let him be free of mountain solitudes;
And have around him, whether heard or not,
The pleasant melody of woodland birds.
Few are his pleasures: if his eyes have now
Been doomed so long to settle upon earth
That not without some effort they behold
The countenance of the horizontal sun,
Rising or setting, let the light at least
Find a free entrance to their languid orbs.
And let him, 'where' and 'when' he will, sit down
Beneath the trees, or on a grassy bank
Of highway side, and with the little birds
Share his chance-gathered meal; and, finally,
As in the eye of Nature he has lived,
So in the eye of Nature let him die!
The Old Cumberland Beggar
-William Wordsworth
1789
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"France had lost a large portion of her native industry through Colbert's protective system, could be levelled against Colbert only by that school which utterly ignored the revocation of the Edict of Nantes with its disastrous consequences. In consequence of these deplorable measures, in the course of three years after Colbert's death half a million of the most industrious, skilful, and thriving inhabitants of France were banished; who, consequently, to the double injury of France which they had enriched, transplanted their industry and their capital to Switzerland, to every Protestant country in Germany, especially to Prussia, as also to Holland and England. Thus the intrigues of a bigoted courtesan ruined in three years the able and gifted work of a whole generation, and cast France back again into its previous state of apathy."The National System of Political Economy 1841
- Friedrich List
![]() |
| The Day Book
Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers 1916 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Each
parish was supposed to feed its own poor; but for this it would have been
necessary for the poor to feed the poor. So these lovely edicts were without
effect, and the only way to help the poor, by decreasing the taxes with which
they were burdened, was never put into practice. On the contrary, they were
increased.”
Poverty Observed: Journal of a Country Priest
-Abbé Lefuevre
"No one has ever become poor by giving."
-Anne Frank
"Confidence is the prize given to the mediocre."
- Robert Hughes
"No one has ever become poor by giving."
-Anne Frank
"Confidence is the prize given to the mediocre."
- Robert Hughes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vulnerability refers to the risk a
person or group may have of crossing the poverty line. It describes the
probability of becoming poor and is a function of external shocks and stresses.
Some researchers not that dual risks experiences by such groups: that of
external threats to livelihood and security (for example, climate, market
collapse, etc) and the lack of internal preparedness for times of crisis.
The transient poor refers to those
groups who resources are only slightly below established needs and so they
suffer from persistent deprivation. To make reference to the levels at which a
person, household, or group falls below the poverty line, researches often
refer to the depth of poverty. The depth of poverty, as well as its incidence,
can ne measured using the poverty gap measure.
The poverty gap is the mean shortfall from the poverty line.
Capabilities deprivation identifies
poverty in terms of “the lives of people can actually lead and the freedoms
they do actually have.” As such, the “capabilities approach” extends the
concepts of human poverty by drawing distinct connections between development,
freedom, and deprivation of human capabilities.
Capabilities refer to the ability
of a person to convert commodities into valued functionings in the context of
one’s life. A functioning is an “achievement of a person; what he manages to do
or to be.” For example, food is a commodity that enables a person to satisfy
hunger and to provide eating pleasure. And yet for a person to convert this
commodity in daily “functioning”, she must have the capability to do so. As
such, commodities have no intrinsic value in the absence of a person’s ability
to convert goods into achievement.
- M. Mowafi and M. Khawaja
Poverty
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
![]() |
| French Estates 1789 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
| Little Boy Eating Melon - Ernesto Galarza 1965 |
Povre je suis de ma jeunesse
De povre et de petite extrasse;
Mon pere n’eust oncq grant richesse,
Ne son ayeul, nommé Orace;
Povreté tous nous suit et trece.
Sur les tumbeaux de mes ancestres,
Les ames desquelz dieu embrasse!
On n’y voit couronnes ne ceptres.
(Poor I am, and from my youth,
Born of a poor and humble stock.
My father never had much wealth
Nor yet his grandfather, Orace.
Poverty tracks us, every one.
Upon the tombs of my ancestors,
The souls of whom may God embrace!
Sceptres and crowns aren't to be seen.)
Sceptres and crowns aren't to be seen.)
Le Testament
- Villon, François.
1461
1461
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mother Theresa -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dwight D. Eisenhower
"A Simple Path" 1995 "Budget and Military Budget" 1953
"The greatest disease in the "Every gun that is made, every warship
West today is not TB or leprosy; launched, every rocket fired signifies in
it is being unwanted, unloved and the final sense, a theft from those who
uncared for. We can cure physical hunger and are not fed, those who are cold
diseases with medicine, but the and not clothes. This world in arms is not
only cure for loneliness, despair, spending money alone. It is spending the
and hopelessness is love. There sweat of its laborers, the genius of its
are many in the world who are scientists, the hopes of its children. This is
dying for a piece of bread but not a way of life at all in any true sense.
there are many more dying for a Under the clouds of war, it is humanity
little love. The poverty in the West hanging on a cross of iron."
is a different kind of poverty -- it
is a poverty of loneliness but also
of spirituality. There's a hunger for
love, as there is a hunger for God."
Robert Hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Walter Benjamin
"The Rise of Andy Warhol," 1932 "Little History of Photography," 1931
"If you want to know all about Andy Everyone will have noticed how much
Warhol told an interviewer, "just look easier it is to get a hold of a painting, more
at the surface of my paintings and films particularly a sculpture, and especially
and me, and there I am. There's nothing architecture, in a photograph than in reality.
behind it." This kind of coyness looked, It's all too tempting to blame this squarely
at the time, faintly threatening. For on the decline of artistic appreciation, on a
without a doubt, there was something failure of contemporary sensibility. But one
strange about so form an adherence to is brought up short by the way the
the surface. It went against the grain of understanding of great works was
high art as such. What had become of the transformed at about the same time the
belief, dear to modernism, that the power techniques of reproduction were being
and cathartic necessity of art flowed from developed. Such works can no longer be
realized image? No trace of it; the paintings so vast it can be assimilated only through
were all superficies, no symbol. Their miniaturization. The creative in photography
blankness seemed eerie. is its capitulation to fashion. The world is
They did not share the reforming hopes beautiful - that is watchword. In it is
of modernism. In general, his only subject unmasked the posture of a photography that
was detachment: the condition of being a can endow any soup can with cosmic
spectator, dealing hands-off with the world significance but cannot grasp a single one of
through the filter of photography. the human connections in which it exists,
Thus his paintings, roughly silkscreened, even when this photography's most dream-
full of slips, mimicked the dissociation of gaze laden subjects are a forerunner more of its
and empathy induced by the mass media: the salability than of any knowledge it might
banal punch of tabloid newsprint, the visual produce. But because the true face of this
jabber and bright sleazy color of TV, the sense kind of photographic creativity is the
of glut and anesthesia caused by both. advertisement or association, its logical
We must become thoroughly familiar with the real conditions
and features of the life of the various social groups and population strata. We
must know the real conditions in their entire real variety. We must take into
consideration not simply money but also the real possibility of backing such
money with commodities and services; not simply square meters of new housing
but also the amount of time we must wait before we have access to these meters;
not simply bed-spaces in hospitals but also the number of people who need them.
Such accurate and scrupulously computed information is
needed not only by those in charge of the allocations and making responsible decisions.
It is needed by all of us in order to develop objective and unprejudiced views
on the real processes that are taking place in reality and be familiar with
their trends. And so, let us talk about real processes and their trends. One
can understand the resentment of people who consider themselves ignored by
society.
Poverty
World Affairs Institute
1989
1989
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() |
| -Gustave Doré 1880 |
"Yes; I looked at them as you would any other human being, with a curiosity of their impulses, motives, capacities, weaknesses, when brought to the test of an inexorable physical necessity. Restraint! What possible restraint? Was it superstition, disgust, patience, fear - or some kind of primitive honor? No fear can stand up to hunger, no patience can wear it out, disgust simply does not exist where hunger is; and as to superstition, beliefs, and what you may call principals, they are less than chaff in a breeze. Don't you know the devilry of lingering starvation, its exasperating torment, its black thoughts, its somber and brooding ferocity? Well, I do. It takes a man all his inborn strength to fight hunger properly. It's really easier to face bereavement, dishonor, and the perdition of one's soul - than this kind of prolonged hunger" (Conrad 38-39).
Heart of Darkness
-Joseph Conrad
1899
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"If the poverty were voluntary, there might be some difference. Strong instances of self-denial operate
powerfully on our minds, and a man who has no wants has obtained great freedom and firmness and even dignity."
Reflections on the Revolution in France
-Edmund Burke
1790
![]() |
| A Tramp and His Deeds -Arthur Burdett 1883 “Poverty is not a matter of low well-being, but of the inability to purse well-being precisely because of the lack of economic means.” Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty
-David Brady
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE REAL ISSUE: WHO CAN SURVIVE ON TODAY'S MINIMUM WAGE?
The minimum wage is meant to be a living wage. “By living wages, I mean more than a bare subsistence level – I mean the wages of a decent living.” President Roosevelt’s words in 1933, five years before the first minimum wage became law. These days, it’s anything but a living wage. Someone working full-time at the federal minimum earns an annual paycheck of just $15,080 – below the poverty line for even a family of two. For the minimum-wage earner with a family of four, a full-time paycheck falls almost $9,000 below the poverty line, which is $23,850. Even a $10.10/hour full-time job – an annual $21,008 – falls short.
Pay is not the only problem with minimum wage jobs, either. Many don’t offer full-time hours, even when workers want them. And new shift-scheduling software which is cost-efficient for the employer (booking employees only at highest traffic times) can be hell for the employee. Ever-changing and on-call schedules, split shifts and the dreaded “clopening” (closing up the store at night and having to report early the next morning for opening) make it hard to take a second job or attend college classes or arrange for child care. Minimum-wage employees are also vulnerable to so-called wage theft, reducing their pay even further, a spate of recent lawsuits has revealed: everything from no overtime pay and erased time cards, to off-the-clock time employees are forced to spend checking schedules or going through lengthy security bag-checks.
THE TYPICAL MINIMUM WAGE WORKER
Contrary to stereotype, the typical minimum-wage worker is not a middle-class teenager earning pocket money. According to the CBO, based on Census Bureau data, 88% of minimum wage earners are adults 20 or older; 55% are women. For these adults and their families, proper housing is unaffordable, as a February 2015 report from the National Low Income Housing Coalition (based on federal data) shows: A minimum-wage earner would need to work, on average, 2.6 full-time jobs to rent a decent two-bedroom apartment for less than 30% of her or his income.
All of this helps explain why so many minimum-wage workers are also on some kind of public assistance. A University of California, Berkeley, study, for instance, found that more than half of fast-food workers are enrolled in one or more public programs. Forbes summed up the economic impact of this with the headline: “Fast Food Companies Outsource $7 Billion In Annual Labor Costs To Taxpayers.”
Raising the minimum wage to even $10.10 would reduce government expenditures on current income-support programs by at least $7.6 billion per year, according to analyst David Cooper of the Economic Policy Institute. “Essentially, low-wage employers are being subsidized by the taxpayer. Prices are going up, but paychecks are not, and taxpayers are making up the difference.”
THE BOTTOM LINE
The minimum wage in the United States is no longer a living wage. At $7.25, the federal minimum hasn’t kept up with the cost of living since the late 60s, and there’s a growing movement among workers, policy analysts, state and city governments – and even some employers – to raise it. A boost to just $10.10 would lift 900,000 out of poverty, projects the CBO. While opponents argue that raising the minimum wage would be bad for businesses and the economy, increasingly sophisticated economic research shows that a rise in the minimum wage does not automatically cause job losses and can act as an economic stimulus as it boosts the spending power of millions of workers. And then there’s the simple point, as Senator Tom Harkin put it: “In a nation as wealthy as the United States, no one who works hard for a living should live in poverty."
![]() |
| Family in Poverty 1792 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Mom, Poor Mom
Highly paid women are
more likely than women earning less to postpone child-rearing. Early commitment
to their careers reduces the economic impact of becoming a mother. But highly
paid women also derive significant advantages from greater resources. The
ability to purchase reliable child-care services, for instance, makes it easier
to maintain high levels of participation in paid employment.
Women with lower
earnings are more likely to cycle in and out of jobs, forced to quit if
child-care arrangements fall through or they experience a family health crisis.
This employment instability tends to lower their hourly wages and may also lead
employers to be wary of hiring them.
One cruel aspect of
policies in this country is that, as Professor Budig and Ms. Hodges put it,
“high-earning childless women hold the most family-friendly jobs” — those with
paid family leaves, sick days and vacation time.
Although mothers are
underrepresented in the highest echelons, those that reach them derive
substantial benefits from family-friendly policies. Indeed, Professor Budig and
Ms. Hodges find a motherhood bonus among those in the top 5 percent of the
earnings distribution, where having children goes along with increased
earnings.
These “supermoms” are
often in super jobs (and are able to hire super nannies). The other 95 percent
of mothers pay a penalty that increases their economic vulnerability.
More universal family
policies, such as early-childhood education, paid family leave, paid sick days
and paid vacation time could help most working mothers substantially increase
their earnings.
But the very
divisions among mothers that Professor Budig and Ms. Hodges observe could help
explain lack of political will to implement such policies.
We used to hear that
low-income women were having children to get a free ride from public
assistance. But mothers depend far more heavily on paychecks than on welfare
checks, working long hours at low pay in order to finance their labor of love.
The strict restrictions
on public assistance put into place in 1996 did not reduce birth rates,
which remained steady at an average of slightly more than two children per
woman.
The surge in
unemployment over the last three years, however, has discouraged potential
parents. Birth rates have declined sharply,
reaching a hundred-year low.
We now see fewer new
mothers, more old mothers, more poor mothers and more poor children.
Too bad more of the
rich mothers currently running for office aren’t more worried about these
trends.
-Nancy Folbre
![]() |
| Poverty in London -Gustave Doré 1873 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"We must learn to love those incomparably useless and precious beings, the child, the elderly, the unborn, and the dying, because they and we are one."
-William Wordsworth
1789
![]() |
| Homeless American Children -Jerry Nelson 2015 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You hear a lot of dialog on the death of the American family. Families aren't dying. They're merging into big conglomerates."
-Erma Bombeck
1978
![]() |
| Awaiting the Deliverer Beihong Xu 1930
His final farewell to his wife:
I end my days today.
Judged this 23 Ventôse, 1794.
I embrace my wife and children."
"He made jokes up to the moment when he told all the onlookers that he wished them a happier lot; that, as far as he was concerned, he was dying for a matter of very little importance. He then took his leave of all the citizens, laughing the while."
Last Letters
From the French Revolution
-Olivier Blanc
1793-1794 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miscellany
“France has bought poverty by crime! France has not sacrificed her virtue to her interest, but she has abandoned her interest, that she might prostitute her virtue. All other nations have begun the fabric of a new government, or the reformation of an old, by establishing originally or by enforcing with greater exactness some rites or other of religion. All other people have laid the foundations of civil freedom in severer manners and a system of a more austere and masculine morality. France, when she let loose the reins of regal authority, doubled the license of a ferocious dissoluteness in manners and of an insolent irreligion in opinions and practice, and has extended through all ranks of life, as if she were communicating some privilege or laying open some secluded benefit, all the unhappy corruptions that usually were the disease of wealth and power.”
Reflections on the Revolution in France
-Edmund Burke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The people now armed themselves with such weapons as
they could find in Armourer's shops and private houses,
and with bludgeons, and were roaming all night through
all parts of the city without any decided practicable object.
They took all the arms, discharged the prisoners and such of
the garrison as were not killed in the first moment of fury,
carried the Governor and Lieutenant governor to the Greve
cut off their heads and sent them through the city of
triumph to the Palais royal."
-From Thomas Jefferson's Letter to John Cay
![]() |
| Thomas Jefferson's Letter to John Cay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Squire's Door
George Morland
1790
“They have made no sacrifices to their
projects of greater consequence than their shoe buckles, whilst they were
imprisoning their king, murdering their fellow citizens, and bathing in tears
and plunging in poverty and distress thousands of worthy men and worthy
families. Their cruelty has not even been the base result of fear. It has been
the effect of their sense of perfect safety, in authorizing treasons,
robberies, rapes, assassinations, slaughters, and burnings throughout their
harassed land. But the cause of all was plain from the beginning.”
Reflections on the Revolution in France. -Edmund Burke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Conversations

Mother Theresa -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dwight D. Eisenhower
"A Simple Path" 1995 "Budget and Military Budget" 1953
"The greatest disease in the "Every gun that is made, every warship
West today is not TB or leprosy; launched, every rocket fired signifies in
it is being unwanted, unloved and the final sense, a theft from those who
uncared for. We can cure physical hunger and are not fed, those who are cold
diseases with medicine, but the and not clothes. This world in arms is not
only cure for loneliness, despair, spending money alone. It is spending the
and hopelessness is love. There sweat of its laborers, the genius of its
are many in the world who are scientists, the hopes of its children. This is
dying for a piece of bread but not a way of life at all in any true sense.
there are many more dying for a Under the clouds of war, it is humanity
little love. The poverty in the West hanging on a cross of iron."
is a different kind of poverty -- it
is a poverty of loneliness but also
of spirituality. There's a hunger for
love, as there is a hunger for God."
Robert Hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Walter Benjamin
"The Rise of Andy Warhol," 1932 "Little History of Photography," 1931
"If you want to know all about Andy Everyone will have noticed how much
Warhol told an interviewer, "just look easier it is to get a hold of a painting, more
at the surface of my paintings and films particularly a sculpture, and especially
and me, and there I am. There's nothing architecture, in a photograph than in reality.
behind it." This kind of coyness looked, It's all too tempting to blame this squarely
at the time, faintly threatening. For on the decline of artistic appreciation, on a
without a doubt, there was something failure of contemporary sensibility. But one
strange about so form an adherence to is brought up short by the way the
the surface. It went against the grain of understanding of great works was
high art as such. What had become of the transformed at about the same time the
belief, dear to modernism, that the power techniques of reproduction were being
and cathartic necessity of art flowed from developed. Such works can no longer be
the unconscious, through the knot work of regarded as the products of individuals; they
dream, memory, and desire, into the have become a collective creation, a corpusrealized image? No trace of it; the paintings so vast it can be assimilated only through
were all superficies, no symbol. Their miniaturization. The creative in photography
blankness seemed eerie. is its capitulation to fashion. The world is
They did not share the reforming hopes beautiful - that is watchword. In it is
of modernism. In general, his only subject unmasked the posture of a photography that
was detachment: the condition of being a can endow any soup can with cosmic
spectator, dealing hands-off with the world significance but cannot grasp a single one of
through the filter of photography. the human connections in which it exists,
Thus his paintings, roughly silkscreened, even when this photography's most dream-
full of slips, mimicked the dissociation of gaze laden subjects are a forerunner more of its
and empathy induced by the mass media: the salability than of any knowledge it might
banal punch of tabloid newsprint, the visual produce. But because the true face of this
jabber and bright sleazy color of TV, the sense kind of photographic creativity is the
of glut and anesthesia caused by both. advertisement or association, its logical
counterpart is the act of unmasking or
construction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further Remarks
Rethinking the Sociological
Measurement of Poverty
-David
Brady
Conceptualizing Poverty as
Social Exclusion
Recently, poverty analysts have grown dissatisfied with
narrow theoretical conceptualizations and measures of poverty. In fact, narrow
perceptions of poverty may fundamentally underestimate the extent and severity
of poverty. European scholars have advanced the concept of social exclusion as
an attempt to broaden the conceptualization of poverty and to facilitate
measurement innovations. Conceptualizing poverty as social exclusion can
provide a novel and beneficial direction for the U.S. sociology of poverty.
Potentially, the concept of social exclusion will suggest new sets of
interesting sociological questions and provide different theoretical
interpretations of old findings. Therefore, conceptualizing poverty as social
exclusion is a criterion for an ideal measure of poverty.
The notion of social exclusion echoes the classic concern
that “the poor are losing their links with the greater world.” In addition,
social exclusion is consistent with the concept of social dislocation, which is
described as limited differential opportunities for economic resources,
political privileges, organizational influence, and cultural experiences.
Social exclusion can be understood as “people being prevented from
participation in the normal activities of the society in which they live or
being incapable of functioning”. In sum, social exclusion means incomplete
citizenship and unequal access to the status, benefits, and experiences of
typical citizens in society.
Though social exclusion has multiple meanings, the concept
can also be reduced to one central notion. If an individual is socially
excluded, that person has a limited capability
to effectively participate in society. Capability refers to the ability to
function effectively in society and have the freedom to participate fully an
equally with the mainstream. Capability offers a promising link between poverty
and social exclusion, as social exclusion defines the lack of the basic
capabilities that make one poor. Arguments have been formulated based on
inequality and poverty around people’s substantive freedom of choice to achieve
valuable functionings and well-being. A functioning member of society must have
basic freedoms (or capabilities) to participate in society’s main institutions.
Thus, the concepts of social exclusion and capability present an engaging,
broadening direction for analysts of social inequality. To date, however, the
connection to poverty measurement has not been fully articulate. Social
exclusion, and hence capability, facilitate the reconceptualization of poverty
in two main ways.
First, these concepts explicitly and implicitly necessitate
a relative measure of poverty. Explicitly, policy debates for relative poverty
measures have been influenced by the concept of social exclusion. The notion of
social exclusion has been deployed in the European debate about the community -
and society – specific nature of poverty. In 1984, when the European Commission
constructed measures of poverty, the Council of Ministers overtly linked their
measures to social exclusion by defining poverty as “persons whose resources
are so limited to exclude them from the minimum acceptable way of life in the
Member State in which they live.”
Second, social exclusion and the economic market are strongly
connected. Because poverty is primarily an economic phenomenon and social
exclusion is multifaceted and complex, the two may seem incompatible. It may
even seem inappropriate to treat social exclusion as a market phenomenon rather
than as a cultural, institutional, and social concept. However, the economic
market is one of several main mechanisms triggering social exclusion. In
postindustrial welfare states, a low level of economic resources is a principal
precursor to social exclusion. In effect, an interest in social exclusion demands
an interest in economic inequality. “A government professing itself concerned
with social exclusion but indifferent to inequality is, to put it charitably,
suffering from a certain amount of confusion.” The essence of social exclusion
thus involves the dual marginalization by society’s institutions and, especially
the market.
The link between social exclusion and the market, and hence
poverty, is made even more clear by returning to capability. “Poverty is not a
matter of low well-being, but of the inability to purse well-being precisely
because of the lack of economic means.” Even with the nuanced concept of
capability, a basic level of economic means is essential for escaping poverty.
While this basic level of capability almost implies an absolute definition of
poverty, this need not be the case. Though poverty is absolute in terms of capabilities,
it is plausible, and even appropriate, that poverty is relative in terms of economic
resources. Therefore, capability can be an absolute concept entailing basic
levels of social functioning, while being measured as a relative economic
standing. Thus capability and social exclusion, as attributes of poverty, emerge
from a relative measure of poverty.
Shortcomings of the Official U.S. Measure
In recent years, many scholars, journalists and policy
makers have criticized the official U.S. measure of poverty, emphasizing that
the U.S. measure is “commonly acknowledged to be inadequate for measuring
poverty.” Also arguing that the U.S. measure “does not capture the real
dimensions of hardship and deprivation, it also does not reflect the changing
depth or severity of poverty.” The Family Support Act of 1988 called for a
scientific review of the U.S. measure. In 1995, the National Research Council
(NRC), and specifically the Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance, published
the results of this scientific review. In this report, the NRC panel, which include
many of America’s most influential poverty researches, broadly concluded that
that U.S. measure is outdated and should not be retained.
Moreover, many analysts fault the U.S. measure’s lack of reliability because it obscures
differences in the extent of poverty among population groups and across
geographical contexts and provides an inaccurate picture of trends over time.
The measure remains unchanged after thirty years, significant demographic,
economic, and policy changes are ignored. Specially, the NRC noted the
increased labor force participation of mothers, the related escalating need and
expenses for child care and health insurance, differences in health status, and
the inappropriateness of antiquated family size adjustments laments the
unsophisticated equivalence scale, which does not reliably measure poverty
across family sizes and forms. It also explains that the relative share of
family budgets devoted to different goods and services has changed. Over time,
the U.S. measure has depreciated from its value in 1963 and become unreflective
of what a family really needs to avoid poverty. Because of rising consumption
and living standards, the NRC concluded that updating the poverty threshold
solely with inflation is increasingly inadequate. In short, the U.S. measure
lacks reliability due in large part to the limited and weak means of adjusting
the measure since its inception.
Similarly, many scholars argue that the U.S. measure lacks validity because it fails to capture the
complex nature of poverty. Many increasingly burdensome family expenses (such
as health and child care) are not encompassed in the U.S. measure. In addition,
the measure ignores cash, near-income, and in-kind public assistance, as well
as the taxes that effectively alter a family’s disposable income. Neglecting
these government benefits, the U.S. measure violates the transfer axiom, fails
to grasp the financial reality of poor families, and significantly
underestimates the extent of poverty in the U.S. In sum, the U.S. measure lacks
both validity and reliability and warrants revision.
Though the construction of a flawless measure is unlikely,
the NRC and others suggest important revisions to improve poverty measurement.
First, many scholars argue for a more significant temporal revision to the
measure as living standards and consumption rise. Second, many analysts argue
simply that the threshold should be raised to include those just above or near
the poverty line. Third, a rising consensus argues for a reorientation toward a
relative standard. While the U.S. measure purports to delineate a family’s
absolute level of minimum needs, the NRC recommended that the threshold be
explicitly refocused on the relative consumption of contemporary U.S. families.
With the NRC’s proposed alternative measure, analysts have demonstrated
significantly different historical trends in U.S. poverty; much higher poverty
rates, smaller gaps between child and adult poverty rates and importantly,
different social consequences of child poverty. Unfortunately, despite these
scholars’ efforts, the government has not implemented significant changes to
its measure. While a lack of political will probably explains the inaction of
the U.S. government, sociologists have no such justification. It is time that
sociologists moved away from this flawed measure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Works Cited
Barzun, Jacques. From Dawn to Decadence. New York: 2000. HarperCollins, 2000.
Blanc, Olivier. Last Letters. From the French Revoltuion. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York:
Noonday, 1793-1794. Print.
Brady, David. Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty. 3rd ed. Vol. 81. 2003. Oxford
University Press. Print. Web. Apr. 25, 2015.
Cave. Economics in The French Revolution. The Cave, 1790. Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
Christopher, Karen. The Poverty Line Forty Years Later: Alternative Poverty Measures and Women's
Lives. Vol. 12, No. 2. 2005. JSTOR. Jean Ait Belkhir, Race, Gender, & Class Journal, 2005.
Web. 22 Apr. 2015.
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Robert Kimbrough. An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds and
Sources, Essays in Criticism. New York: Norton. 1963. Print.
Corbis, Bettmann. Sold Off Siblings. NWI.com. 4 Aug. 1948. Web. 25 Mar. 2015
Doré, Gustave. Poverty in London. Digital image. Artstor. 1873. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Doud, Richard. Oral History Interview with Dorothea Lange. May 22, 1964. Oral Histories. Archives
of American Art. Web. 16 Apr. 2015.
Du Tertre, Jean-Baptiste. The Barnyard. 1667. Digital image. Chnm.gmu.edu. Web. 1 Mar. 2015.
Edmund, Burke. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Consitution.org. Constitution Society, 1790.
Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
Frank, Anne. Ann Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl. New York: Washington Square, 1963. Print.
French Estates 1789. Cartoon 1789 - Collection Banque Nationale de Paris. Historywiz. Liberté,
Egalité, Fraternité: The French Revolution. Web. 23 Apr. 2015.
Folbre, Nancy. Rich Mom, Poor Mom. NYTimes, 25 Oct. 2010. Web. 01 Apr. 2015.
Frost, A. B. (Arthur Burdett). A Tramp and His Deeds. 1883. Digital image. Artstor. Web. 29 Mar.
2015
Galarza, Ernesto. Little Boy Eating Melon. 1965. Digital image. Quest.eb.com. Encyclopædia
Britannica ImageQuest, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2015.
Heie, Harold. Poverty in the USA. Digital image. Respectful Conversation. 5 May 2012. Web. 24 Feb.
2015.
Hellwig, Basia. Can A Family Survive On The U.S. Minimum Wage?. Investopedia, 26 Feb. 2015.
Web. 07 Apr. 2015.
Hellyer, Thomas. The Wanton Dying in Poverty & Disease. 1796. Digital image. Artstor. Web. 29
Mar. 2015.
Investopedia. International Poverty Line Definition. Investopedia, 25 Feb. 2010. Web. 07 Apr. 2015.
Jefferson, Thomas. Letter from Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, 07/19/1789. National Archives, 1789.
Web. 19 Mar. 2015.
Kaplow, Jeffry. France on the Eve of Revolution: A Book of Readings. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, 1971. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lange, Dorothea. A Destitute Mother. 1936. History.com. A&E Television Networks. Web. 16 Apr.
2015.
Le Defecit. 1789. Cartoon 1789 - Collection Banque Nationale de Paris. Historywiz. Liberté, Egalité,
Fraternité: The French Revolution. Web. 23 Apr. 2015.
Les Miserables. Dir. Tom Hooper. Perf. Anne Hathaway. Working Title Films, 2012. Film.
Liraco. Old Man. Digital image. WordPress. 26 Oct. 2014. Web. 1 Mar. 2015.
List, Friedrich. The National System of Political Economy. Online Library of Liberty. Trans.
Sampson S. Lloyd. 1841. Oll.libertyfund.org. Web. 16 Mar. 2015.
Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1st Ed., Chapters I-III. 1978. Web. 27
Feb. 2015.
May, Gary. Poor People's March on Washington. Digital image. Moyers & Company, 10 May 1968.
Web.
Millet, Jean-François. The Gleaners. 1857. Digital image. Artstor. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Milliot, Jim. Publishers Weekly. Michael Coffey. Book Reviews, Bestselling Books & Publishing
Business News | PublishersWeekly.com. Web. 13 Mar. 2015.
Morland, George. The Squire's Door. 1790. Digital image. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Mowafi, M. Poverty. Vol. 59, No. 4. 1979. M. Khawaja. Journal of Epidemiology and Community
Health. JSTOR.Web. 23 Apr. 2015.
Neary, Lynn. ‘Grapes of Wrath’ Is 75, But Its Depictions Of Poverty Are Timeless. NPR. 14, Apr.
2014. Web. 26. Apr. 2015.
Nelson, Jerry. Homeless American Children. 2013. Digital image. Google Images. Web. 27
Feb. 2015.
Northcote, James. Diligence and Dissipation: or the progress of a modest girl and a wanton. 1796.
Oxford Text Archive. London: H. L. Galabin. Print.
Riis, Jacob. Jacob Riis Video. History.com. A&E Television Networks, Web. 04 Mar. 2015.
Robespierre, Maximilian. Speech to the National Convention : The Terror Justified. 1974. Web. 5
Feb. 2015
Rytov, Yuriy. Poverty. Vol. 152, No. 1. 1989. T. Khudyakova, M. Kravchenko, M. Berger, and Vasiliy
Ignatovich. JSTOR. World Affairs Institute, summer 1989. Web. 22 Apr. 2015.
Serrat, Olivier. Embracing Failure. Asian Development Bank, Feb. 2010 Cornell University. Web.
1 Mar. 2015.
The Day Book. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers.1914. Lib. of Congress. News
about Chronicling America RSS. Web. 22 Apr. 2015.
Villon, François. Le Testament. 1461. PoetryFoundation.org. Web. 26 Feb. 2015.
Vollmann, William T. Poor People. Harper Perennial, 22 Jan. 2008. Amazon. Web. 1 Mar. 2015.
Wordsworth, William. Beggars. The Complete Poetical Works. Bartleby.com London: Macmillan
and Co., 1888; Bartleby.com, 1999. Web. 16 Mar. 2015
Xu, Beihong. Awaiting the Deliverer. 1930-1933. Digital image. Artstor. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Yu, Ben. Unemployed. 1941. Digital image. Artstor. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
















































